.... BOO!!! ...

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

...I see I scared you into hacking away at this post, while I tried to write it

Post  true lilly on Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:19 pm

KIM SATTLER, "A MURRI WOMAN", From QUEENSLAND."A MURRI WOMAN" means SHE CLAIMS THE EXTRA BENEFITS

AUSTRALIANS PAY TO ABORIGINALS.
So, I Googled, "Kim Sattler", images,

after reading The STORY (4th link below) in THE AGE (Fairfax),
and was NOT AT ALL SURPRISED to find:


vid‑290111_ap_jew3‑408x264.jpg
408 × 229 - Labor figure Kim Sattler named as go-between in protest
http://www.theage.com.au/national/labor-figure-kim-sattler-named-as-gobetween-in-protest-20120128-1qmre.html



2 days ago
sandra_thumb_16x9‑408x264.jpg
brisbanetimes.com.au
408 × 229 - UnionsACT's Kim Sattler named as go-between in protest
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/labor-figure-kim-sattler-named-as-gobetween-in-protest-20120128-1qmre.html


Interesting that those two images were linked to,
BUT NOT FOUND IN, this STORY by Fairfax:

theage.com.au


Labor figure Kim Sattler named as go-between in protest






Misha Schubert

January 28, 2012

Read more: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/labor-figure-kim-sattler-named-as-gobetween-in-protest-20120128-1qmre.html#ixzz1kteOR6z7




Ah, but then another Fairfax paper chooses to omit
that FAT CAT UNIONIST FAT WHITE WOman's
claims to "BEING BLACK",
and tells us:


"Despite having Jewish great-grandparents,
she called for a boycott of
Israeli-made goods
in protest at Israel's 2010 raid on a flotilla of
ships
that was attempting to break the blockade of the Gaza Strip."

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/national/union-leaders-long-history-of-activism-20120129-1qo2v.html#ixzz1ktj5udXI


So, how many of those 8 GREAT-Grandparents
are "THE JEWS" "They" want us to blame,
for that FAT CAT UNIONIST/GREEN/NAZI
SHIT STIRRING FAT WHITE WOman's FILTHY character?



BLACK IS BLACK and WHITE IS WHITE...BUT,
FILTH, COMES IN ALL COLOURS AND STRIPES!




Kim Sattler pictured with Julia Gillard on her Facebook page. Picture: Facebook Supplied

An image added to Ms Sattler's Facebook page in 2007 shows her with Ms
Gillard apparently at a function for Emily's List - a Left-leaning group
promoting
progressive women's political careers.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/julia-gillard-denies-knowing-kim-sattler/story-fn7x8me2-1226256252600





Chinese whispers or a litany of lies?






EVEN after a Julia Gillard staffer resigned, the ABC claimed it was Tony Abbott who incited the Australia Day race riot.

Wilkie questions Gillard over race riot


Andrew Bolt – Monday, January 30, 12 (09:13 am)




Independent MP Andrew
Wilkie also has trouble accepting Julia Gillard’s word on her office’s
involvement in inciting the Australia Day race riot:


<blockquote>

INDEPENDENT
MP Andrew Wilkie has raised the prospect of supporting a no-confidence
motion in Labor over the Australia Day security scare.



Raising serious doubts over the Prime Minister’s version of events of
what went on in her office, Mr Wilkie said yesterday he would back moves
to bring the matter before parliament to help him decide a position
before a no-confidence vote....


Opposition legal affairs spokesman George Brandis would write to AFP
Commissioner Tony Negus tomorrow asking them to investigate the breach
of security. He would cite section 47 of the ACT criminal code which
relates to incitement…



Mr Wilkie confirmed he would support a move by Mr Abbott to suspend
standing orders and debate the issue… “It does seem to be very unlikely
this man has made these decisions off his own bat.”

</blockquote>

UPDATE



Mind you, communications in Gillard’s office seem unusually
dysfunctional, with Gillard not told for 24 hours that her own junior
media adviser had confessed to helping trigger the riot:


<blockquote>Gillard says she only learnt of Tony Hodges’ actions on Friday afternoon – a day after Hodges told his superiors, communications director John McTernan and chief press secretary Sean Kelly. This seems extraordinary.


The reason being suggested for the time it took for the information to
reach her is that there were all sorts of rumours swirling around on who
said what to whom, which had to be fully investigated.



But one crucial piece of information was established. Hodges had confessed …

</blockquote>


UPDATE



If the Liberals had been involved in stirring up a racial protest that
got so violent that Gillard had to be evacuated, how much frothing would
you see from the ABC today?



But this was a riot by Aborigines. It was a riot that had as its prime
target Tony Abbott. It was a riot that damages Leftist causes, from
“reconciliation” to a Labor government’s survival.



And so we hear the ABC’s Jon Faine, for instance, declaring this morning
the riot is a “beat up” and distraction, the Liberals had resorted to
the dark arts themselves and no one seemed in any danger. The police
overreacted.



Just on that “no danger” and blame-the-police line, which is getting
such a workout from Leftist apologists who from their couches feel they
can judge better than the experienced police at the scene… Here is how a
“Kim Sattler” with a unionsACT domain in her email described the riot on the day:






Seems from “Kim Sattler” that she, at least, believed that Abbott was
indeed in danger, and so was Gillard by being too close to him.



But what would she know? She wasn’t in a Melbourne ABC studio. Nor was the police officer we hear shouting ”put your spear away, arsehole.”:







UPDATE



Post modified, to make the qustions for Gillard a separate post above.

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/




Most Commented
I do not believe Gillard, and did not hear her say “sorry”
295
How and why did Labor incite this race riot? UPDATE: Gillard’s story,…251
So who to blame this time for the “climate of hate”? UPDATE:…167
Gillard staffer quits over protest
147
Column - Gillard’s trashing of democracy
132
avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:37 pm

[quote="true lilly"]KIM SATTLER, "A MURRI WOMAN", From QUEENSLAND.

"A MURRI WOMAN" means SHE CLAIMS THE EXTRA BENEFITS
AUSTRALIANS PAY TO ABORIGINALS.

So, I Googled, "Kim Sattler", images,
after reading The STORY (4th link below) in THE AGE (Fairfax),
and was NOT AT ALL SURPRISED to find:

vid‑290111_ap_jew3‑408x264.jpg
408 × 229 - Labor figure Kim Sattler named as go-between in protest
http://www.theage.com.au/national/labor-figure-kim-sattler-named-as-gobetween-in-protest-20120128-1qmre.html


2 days ago
sandra_thumb_16x9‑408x264.jpg
brisbanetimes.com.au
408 × 229 - UnionsACT's Kim Sattler named as go-between in protest
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/labor-figure-kim-sattler-named-as-gobetween-in-protest-20120128-1qmre.html

Interesting that those two images were linked to,
BUT NOT FOUND IN, this STORY by Fairfax:


theage.com.au
Labor figure Kim Sattler named
as go-between in protest

Misha Schubert
January 28, 2012
Read more: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/labor-figure-kim-sattler-named-as-gobetween-in-protest-20120128-1qmre.html#ixzz1kteOR6z7

Ah, but then another Fairfax paper chooses to omit
that FAT CAT UNIONIST FAT WHITE WOman's
claims to "BEING BLACK",
and tells us:


"Despite having Jewish great-grandparents,
she called for a boycott of Israeli-made goods
in protest at Israel's 2010 raid on a flotilla of ships
that was attempting to break the blockade of the Gaza Strip."

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/national/union-leaders-long-history-of-activism-20120129-1qo2v.html#ixzz1ktj5udXI

So, how many of those 8 GREAT-Grandparents
are "THE JEWS" "They" want us to blame,
for that FAT CAT UNIONIST/GREEN/NAZI
SHIT STIRRING FAT WHITE WOman's FILTHY character?



BLACK IS BLACK and WHITE IS WHITE...BUT,
FILTH, COMES IN ALL COLOURS AND STRIPES!




Kim Sattler pictured with Julia Gillard on her Facebook page.
Picture: Facebook Supplied


An image added to Ms Sattler's Facebook page in 2007 shows her with Ms
Gillard apparently at a function for Emily's List - a Left-leaning group
promoting
progressive women's political careers.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/julia-gillard-denies-knowing-kim-sattler/story-fn7x8me2-1226256252600

Chinese whispers or a litany of lies?

EVEN after a Julia Gillard staffer resigned,
the ABC claimed it was Tony Abbott who incited the Australia Day race riot.

Wilkie questions Gillard over race riot
Andrew Bolt – Monday, January 30, 12 (09:13 am)

Independent MP Andrew Wilkie also has trouble accepting Julia Gillard’s word
on her office’s involvement in inciting the Australia Day race riot:

INDEPENDENT
<blockquote> MP Andrew Wilkie has raised the prospect of supporting a no-confidence
motion in Labor over the Australia Day security scare.


Raising serious doubts over the Prime Minister’s version of events of
what went on in her office, Mr Wilkie said yesterday he would back moves
to bring the matter before parliament to help him decide a position
before a no-confidence vote....

Opposition legal affairs spokesman George Brandis would write to AFP
Commissioner Tony Negus tomorrow asking them to investigate the breach
of security. He would cite section 47 of the ACT criminal code which
relates to incitement…

Mr Wilkie confirmed he would support a move by Mr Abbott to suspend
standing orders and debate the issue… “It does seem to be very unlikely
this man has made these decisions off his own bat.”

</blockquote>UPDATE

Mind you, communications in Gillard’s office seem unusually
dysfunctional, with Gillard not told for 24 hours that her own junior
media adviser had confessed to helping trigger the riot:

<blockquote>Gillard says she only learnt of Tony Hodges’ actions on Friday afternoon – a day after Hodges told his superiors, communications director John McTernan and chief press secretary Sean Kelly. This seems extraordinary.


The reason being suggested for the time it took for the information to
reach her is that there were all sorts of rumours swirling around on who
said what to whom, which had to be fully investigated.

But one crucial piece of information was established. Hodges had confessed …

</blockquote>UPDATE

If the Liberals had been involved in stirring up a racial protest that
got so violent that Gillard had to be evacuated, how much frothing would
you see from the ABC today?


But this was a riot by Aborigines. It was a riot that had as its prime
target Tony Abbott. It was a riot that damages Leftist causes, from
“reconciliation” to a Labor government’s survival.

And so we hear the ABC’s Jon Faine, for instance, declaring this morning
the riot is a “beat up” and distraction, the Liberals had resorted to
the dark arts themselves and no one seemed in any danger. The police
overreacted.

Just on that “no danger” and blame-the-police line, which is getting
such a workout from Leftist apologists who from their couches feel they
can judge better than the experienced police at the scene… Here is how a
“Kim Sattler” with a unionsACT domain in her email described the riot on the day:



Seems from “Kim Sattler” that she, at least, believed that Abbott was
indeed in danger, and so was Gillard by being too close to him.

But what would she know? She wasn’t in a Melbourne ABC studio. Nor was the police officer we hear shouting ”put your spear away, arsehole.”:



UPDATE

Post modified, to make the qustions for Gillard a separate post above.

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/

Most Commented
I do not believe Gillard, and did not hear her say “sorry”
295
How and why did Labor incite this race riot? UPDATE: Gillard’s story,…251
So who to blame this time for the “climate of hate”? UPDATE:…167
Gillard staffer quits over protest
147
Column - Gillard’s trashing of democracy
132
true lilly wrote:Nah, this is not what I wrote,
but how the mess made of what wrote, as I was writing it:

KIM SATTLER, "A MURRI WOMAN", From QUEENSLAND."A MURRI WOMAN" means SHE CLAIMS THE EXTRA BENEFITS

AUSTRALIANS PAY TO ABORIGINALS.
So, I Googled, "Kim Sattler", images,

after reading The STORY (4th link below) in THE AGE (Fairfax),
and was NOT AT ALL SURPRISED to find:


vid‑290111_ap_jew3‑408x264.jpg
408 × 229 - Labor figure Kim Sattler named as go-between in protest
http://www.theage.com.au/national/labor-figure-kim-sattler-named-as-gobetween-in-protest-20120128-1qmre.html



2 days ago
sandra_thumb_16x9‑408x264.jpg
brisbanetimes.com.au
408 × 229 - UnionsACT's Kim Sattler named as go-between in protest
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/labor-figure-kim-sattler-named-as-gobetween-in-protest-20120128-1qmre.html


Interesting that those two images were linked to,
BUT NOT FOUND IN, this STORY by Fairfax:

theage.com.au


Labor figure Kim Sattler named as go-between in protest






Misha Schubert

January 28, 2012

Read more: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/labor-figure-kim-sattler-named-as-gobetween-in-protest-20120128-1qmre.html#ixzz1kteOR6z7




Ah, but then another Fairfax paper chooses to omit
that FAT CAT UNIONIST FAT WHITE WOman's
claims to "BEING BLACK",
and tells us:


"Despite having Jewish great-grandparents,
she called for a boycott of
Israeli-made goods
in protest at Israel's 2010 raid on a flotilla of
ships
that was attempting to break the blockade of the Gaza Strip."

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/national/union-leaders-long-history-of-activism-20120129-1qo2v.html#ixzz1ktj5udXI


So, how many of those 8 GREAT-Grandparents
are "THE JEWS" "They" want us to blame,
for that FAT CAT UNIONIST/GREEN/NAZI
SHIT STIRRING FAT WHITE WOman's FILTHY character?



BLACK IS BLACK and WHITE IS WHITE...BUT,
FILTH, COMES IN ALL COLOURS AND STRIPES!




Kim Sattler pictured with Julia Gillard on her Facebook page. Picture: Facebook Supplied

An image added to Ms Sattler's Facebook page in 2007 shows her with Ms
Gillard apparently at a function for Emily's List - a Left-leaning group
promoting
progressive women's political careers.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/julia-gillard-denies-knowing-kim-sattler/story-fn7x8me2-1226256252600




Chinese whispers or a litany of lies?






EVEN after a Julia Gillard staffer resigned, the ABC claimed it was Tony Abbott who incited the Australia Day race riot.

Wilkie questions Gillard over race riot


Andrew Bolt – Monday, January 30, 12 (09:13 am)




Independent MP Andrew
Wilkie also has trouble accepting Julia Gillard’s word on her office’s
involvement in inciting the Australia Day race riot:


<blockquote>

INDEPENDENT
MP Andrew Wilkie has raised the prospect of supporting a no-confidence
motion in Labor over the Australia Day security scare.



Raising serious doubts over the Prime Minister’s version of events of
what went on in her office, Mr Wilkie said yesterday he would back moves
to bring the matter before parliament to help him decide a position
before a no-confidence vote....


Opposition legal affairs spokesman George Brandis would write to AFP
Commissioner Tony Negus tomorrow asking them to investigate the breach
of security. He would cite section 47 of the ACT criminal code which
relates to incitement…



Mr Wilkie confirmed he would support a move by Mr Abbott to suspend
standing orders and debate the issue… “It does seem to be very unlikely
this man has made these decisions off his own bat.”

</blockquote>

UPDATE



Mind you, communications in Gillard’s office seem unusually
dysfunctional, with Gillard not told for 24 hours that her own junior
media adviser had confessed to helping trigger the riot:


<blockquote>Gillard says she only learnt of Tony Hodges’ actions on Friday afternoon – a day after Hodges told his superiors, communications director John McTernan and chief press secretary Sean Kelly. This seems extraordinary.


The reason being suggested for the time it took for the information to
reach her is that there were all sorts of rumours swirling around on who
said what to whom, which had to be fully investigated.



But one crucial piece of information was established. Hodges had confessed …

</blockquote>


UPDATE



If the Liberals had been involved in stirring up a racial protest that
got so violent that Gillard had to be evacuated, how much frothing would
you see from the ABC today?



But this was a riot by Aborigines. It was a riot that had as its prime
target Tony Abbott. It was a riot that damages Leftist causes, from
“reconciliation” to a Labor government’s survival.



And so we hear the ABC’s Jon Faine, for instance, declaring this morning
the riot is a “beat up” and distraction, the Liberals had resorted to
the dark arts themselves and no one seemed in any danger. The police
overreacted.



Just on that “no danger” and blame-the-police line, which is getting
such a workout from Leftist apologists who from their couches feel they
can judge better than the experienced police at the scene… Here is how a
“Kim Sattler” with a unionsACT domain in her email described the riot on the day:






Seems from “Kim Sattler” that she, at least, believed that Abbott was
indeed in danger, and so was Gillard by being too close to him.



But what would she know? She wasn’t in a Melbourne ABC studio. Nor was the police officer we hear shouting ”put your spear away, arsehole.”:







UPDATE



Post modified, to make the qustions for Gillard a separate post above.

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/




Most Commented
I do not believe Gillard, and did not hear her say “sorry”
295
How and why did Labor incite this race riot? UPDATE: Gillard’s story,…251
So who to blame this time for the “climate of hate”? UPDATE:…167
Gillard staffer quits over protest
147
Column - Gillard’s trashing of democracy
132











avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:32 pm

So, FAIRFAX BLAMES 'THE JEWS', to...?

true lilly wrote:


Interestingly though,
it WAS "Breaking" News , but WITH NO LINK or REPORT,
at The GOVERNMENT'S ANTI-ISRAEL/LEFTY ABC,
and now,
EVEN THAT "BREAKING NEWS" HEADLINE IS GONE...

but it's "BROKEN" at Murdoch's Herald Sun...


Suspicious packages found at two embassies

SUSPICIOUS packages have been found at the Israeli and French embassies in Canberra. Read more
avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:35 pm

Suspicious packages found at two embassies
From:
AAP
January 30, 2012

2:00PM


SUSPICIOUS packages have been found at
the Israeli and French embassies in Canberra.

Police say they are investigating the packages at both embassies,
in the suburb of Yarralumla near Parliament House.


"ACT Policing's bomb response team is in attendance,"
a spokeswoman said in a statement.


"Police are urging people to avoid the area."


It was not known whether the two incidents were linked,
the spokeswoman said.


Perth Avenue has been closed.


Related Coverage
avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  Ciggy on Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:19 am



That drunk and stupid-looking sheila on the right, is that one you?
avatar
Ciggy

Posts : 2696
Join date : 2009-01-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  MoMo on Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:34 am



er lilly.............your whole internet career is built on disrespecting Israel and the Jews........are you now admitting you have been wrong about Replacement Theology and your hideously false claim that australia is Zion?

The error Of Replacement Theology

http://www.therefinersfire.org/replacement_theology.htm

THE END TIME SOLUTION TO
REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY!
By Rabbi/Brother Moshe Yoseph Koniuchowsky


http://yourarmstoisrael.org/Articles_new/restoration/?page=3&type=12



http://www.biblicalzionist.com/index.html

The Promised Land:

Is God's Land



Lv 25:23
“‘The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine; for you are strangers and live as foreigners with me.

2Sm 7:23
What one nation in the earth is like your people, even like Israel, whom God went to redeem to himself for a people, and to make him a name, and to do great things for you, and awesome things for your land, before your people, whom you redeem to you out of Egypt, from the nations and their gods?.........



avatar
MoMo

Posts : 1856
Join date : 2011-07-03
Location : outside the box, I pooped in it.

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  Ciggy on Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:00 pm

Being chosen for the dirty work those poor Judeans get assigned, I wouldn't envy in the least. Holocausts, meat bombers in Israel... if that's Yahweh's special blessings keep me in the house of the dirty rotten goyim every day.

Yahweh: sod the fuck off.

Jews: you can keep that rat bastard of an imaginary friend.
avatar
Ciggy

Posts : 2696
Join date : 2009-01-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Mon Jan 30, 2012 3:34 pm

Psalms 72:
http://www.watchtower.org/e/bible/ps/chapter_072.htm
Psalms 72:
http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Psa&c=72&v=1&t=KJV#1
Regarding Solomon.
[[A Psalm] for Solomon 8010.]]
1
O God, give your own judicial decisions to the king,
And your righteousness to the son of the king.

Give 5414 the king 4428 thy judgments 4941, O God 430,
and thy righteousness 6666 unto the king's 4428 son 1121.


2
May he plead the cause of your people with righteousness
And of your afflicted ones with judicial decision.

He shall judge 1777 thy people 5971 with righteousness 6664,
and thy poor 6041 with judgment 4941.


3
Let the mountains carry peace to the people,
Also the hills, through righteousness.

The mountains 2022 shall bring 5375 peace 7965 to the people 5971,
and the little hills 1389, by righteousness 6666.


4
Let him judge the afflicted ones of the people,
Let him save the sons of the poor one,
And let him crush the defrauder.

He shall judge 8199 the poor 6041 of the people 5971,
he shall save 3467 the children 1121 of the needy 34,
and shall break in pieces 1792 the oppressor 6231 .


5
They will fear you as long as there is a sun,
And before the moon for generation after generation.

They shall fear 3372 thee as long as 5973 the sun 8121
and moon 3394 endure 6440, throughout all 1755 generations 1755.

6
He will descend like the rain upon the mown grass,
Like copious showers that wet the earth.

He shall come down 3381 like rain 4306 upon the mown 1488 grass:
as showers 7241 [that] water 2222 the earth 776.

7
In his days the righteous one will sprout,
And the abundance of peace until the moon is no more.

In his days 3117 shall the righteous 6662 flourish 6524 ;
and abundance 7230 of peace 7965 so long as the moon 3394 endureth.

8
And he will have subjects from sea to sea
And from the River to the ends of the earth.

He shall have dominion 7287 also from sea 3220 to sea 3220,
and from the river 5104 unto the ends 657 of the earth 776.


9
Before him the inhabitants of waterless regions will bow down,
And his very enemies will lick the dust itself.

They that dwell in the wilderness 6728 shall bow 3766 before 6440 him;
and his enemies 341 shall lick 3897 the dust 6083.


10
The kings of Tar´shish and of the islands—
Tribute they will pay.
The kings of She´ba and of Se´ba—
A gift they will present.

The kings 4428 of Tarshish 8659 and of the isles 339
shall bring 7725 presents 4503:
the kings 4428 of Sheba 7614 and Seba 5434
shall offer 7126 gifts 814.


11
And to him all the kings will prostrate themselves;
All the nations, for their part, will serve him.

Yea, all kings 4428 shall fall down 7812 before him:
all nations 1471 shall serve 5647 him.


12
For he will deliver the poor one crying for help,
Also the afflicted one and whoever has no helper.

For he shall deliver 5337 the needy 34 when he crieth 7768 ;
the poor 6041 also, and [him] that hath no helper 5826 .


13
He will feel sorry for the lowly one and the poor one,
And the souls of the poor ones he will save.

He shall spare 2347 the poor 1800 and needy 34,
and shall save 3467 the souls 5315 of the needy 34.

14
From oppression and from violence he will redeem their soul,
And their blood will be precious in his eyes.

He shall redeem 1350 their soul 5315 from deceit 8496 and violence 2555:
and precious 3365 shall their blood 1818 be in his sight 5869.


15
And let him live, and to him let some of the gold of She´ba be given.
And in his behalf let prayer be made constantly;
All day long let him be blessed.

And he shall live 2421 , and to him shall be given 5414 of the gold 2091 of Sheba 7614:
prayer also shall be made 6419 for him continually 8548;
[and] daily 3117 shall he be praised 1288 .


16
There will come to be plenty of grain on the earth;
On the top of the mountains there will be an overflow.
His fruit will be as in Leb´a·non,
And those who are from the city will blossom like the vegetation of the earth.

There shall be an handful 6451 of corn 1250 in the earth 776
upon the top 7218 of the mountains 2022;
the fruit 6529 thereof shall shake 7493 like Lebanon 3844:
and [they] of the city 5892 shall flourish 6692 like grass 6212 of the earth 776.


17
Let his name prove to be to time indefinite;
Before the sun let his name have increase,
And by means of him let them bless themselves;
Let all nations pronounce him happy.

His name 8034 shall endure for ever 5769:
his name 8034 shall be continued 5125 5125 as long as 6440 the sun 8121:
and [men] shall be blessed 1288 in him:
all nations 1471 shall call him blessed 833 .


18
Blessed be Jehovah God, Israel’s God,
Who alone is doing wonderful works.

Blessed 1288 [be] the LORD 3068 God 430, the God 430 of Israel 3478,
who only doeth 6213 wondrous things 6381 .


19
And blessed be his glorious name to time indefinite,
And let his glory fill the whole earth.
Amen and Amen.

And blessed 1288 [be] his glorious 3519 name 8034 for ever 5769:
and let the whole earth 776 be filled 4390 [with] his glory 3519;
Amen 543, and Amen 543.


20
The prayers of David, the son of Jes´se, have come to their end.

The prayers 8605 of David 1732 the son 1121 of Jesse 3448 are ended 3615 .
avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Mon Jan 30, 2012 3:46 pm

el kabong wrote:

el kabong's............ internet career...
hee hee...I give freely of my time,
but thanks for admitting that
'you' are a professional spammer
of propaganda and insipid bs.
avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Sun Feb 05, 2012 2:22 pm

Britain plays down Falkland Islands moves
by:From correspondents in London
From:AFP

February 06, 2012
7:22AM


BRITAIN has sought to play down military moves around the Falkland
Islands, as the foreign minister refused to comment on reports it has
moved a nuclear submarine to the tense South Atlantic.


Britain's Daily Mail newspaper on Saturday claimed Prime Minister David Cameron
has personally approved plans to send one of the Royal Navy's most advanced
Trafalgar-class nuclear submarines to the disputed archipelago.


Speaking on Sky News overnight, Foreign Secretary William Hague
declined to confirm or deny the deployment.


"We don't normally make any comment on the deployment of our submarines,"
he said. "But our naval vessels regularly visit the South Atlantic."


Argentina's defence minister, Arturo Puricelli, on Saturday described the reported
deployment as an "unnecessary display of firepower".


Tension has soared between the two countries in recent weeks as the thirtieth
anniversary of a brief but violent war over the windswept islands approaches.


Related Coverage
Prince William, the second in line to the British throne, this week
began a six-week mission with the Royal Air Force (RAF) in the
Falklands, a move that has infuriated Argentina.


The 29-year-old has been sent to the archipelago as part of his duties as
an RAF Sea King helicopter pilot, a deployment Britain says is routine but
Argentina has slammed as a "provocation".


Britain has further ratcheted tensions by announcing that it is to send HMS Dauntless,
a state-of-the-art warship, to the South Atlantic.


Mr Hague overnight dismissed the deployments as "entirely routine military movements".

"Prince William is also on a routine deployment that is part of his job," he added.
"We will resist the diplomatic efforts of Argentina to raise the temperature on this."


The Falklands, known as Las Malvinas in Spanish,
have been held by Britain since 1833 but are also claimed by Argentina.


On April 2, 1982, the then-ruling junta in Argentina invaded the
Falklands, sparking a 74-day war with Britain that cost the lives of
649 Argentine and 255 British troops.


London retained control and has vowed to defend the islands as long as
the inhabitants want to be part of Britain.
____________________
Flying into a storm -
Argentina furious at Prince William's Falklands tour

The Daily Telegraph
February 06, 2012
12:00AM


Diplomatic tensions ... RAF helicopter pilot Prince William.
Source: The Daily Telegraph
___________________________________________

Egypt to put foreign NGO workers on trial
EGYPT is to try 44 people
over the alleged illegal funding of aid groups,

a judicial source said yesterday,
a day after Washington said it would review aid to Cairo
over the crackdown.
Read more

Egypt clashes rage into fourth day
PROTESTERS and police have fought pitched battles
at security headquarters in Cairo
as deadly clashes raged into a fourth day. Read more

US 'to boost' Special Forces in Afghanistan
THE US is planning a major shift in its Afghanistan military strategy,
with reports Special Forces troops will take greater responsibility. Read more

Officials urge diplomatic break with Syria
ARAB leaders and officials have attacked the UN
after Russia and China blocked a resolution
condemning the Damascus regime. Read more

'Signs' of gas in offshore Israel field
AN Israeli company yesterday said it had discovered
"significant signs of natural gas"
after drilling off the country's Mediterranean coast,
in a report to theTel Aviv stock market. Read more
avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:53 pm

Military takes over in Brazil state as homicides soar
Homicides soar in Brazil state after police strike

Police strike sparks crime wave in Brazil state
Posted 6 minutes ago


Brazilian security forces have taken over in Bahia

after a police strike led to a spike in murders and other violent crimes.

Topics:

law-crime-and-justice, crime, brazil


Mexico police find decapitated women
POLICE in northern Mexico have found the decapitated bodies of two women
with missing index fingers, a sign among drug gangs that they believed the
victims were informants.
Read more



Death toll at 16 in Dominican boat wreck
THE death toll from the capsizing of a boat trying to take some 70 migrants
from the Dominican Republic to Puerto Rico has risen to 16, authorities said today.

Read more
avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:10 pm

Norwegian royals evacuated from plane
by:From correspondents in Copenhagen

From:AP

February 05, 2012
9:46PM


A SCANDINAVIAN airlines flight with 135 people on board, including
the Norwegian Crown Prince and Princess, has been evacuated at
Copenhagen's main airport Kastrup after smoke was detected in the cabin.

SAS spokesman Mikkel Thrane says the cabin was filled with smoke
due to an engine problem, but that all passengers were evacuated safely
early today (local time).


He says the plane was bound for Oslo and that Norway's Crown Prince Haakon
and Crown Princess Mette-Marit were among the passengers.


Mette-Marit, who is known for her fear of flying, later thanked the SAS crew
that managed the evacuation, writing on Twitter that her "morning turned out
a bit more exciting than expected .. Phew .. stillnotentirelyoverflightphobia."

Related Coverage
avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:38 pm

No Israel decision on Iran attack - Obama
US President Barack Obama
says he does not think Israel has made a decision
on whether to launch a pre-emptive strike
on Iran's nuclear installations,
a threat that has rattled the region.


Read more
true lilly wrote:
'Barbaric' embassy attack
'served no purpose'


Updated February 06, 2012 09:21:26

Video: Syrian embassy stormed in Canberra
(7pm TV News NSW)

Photo:
A group of up to 40 men stormed the Syrian Embassy in O'Malley

on Saturday night causing extensive damage. (AAP)

Related Story:
Syrian embassy in Canberra attacked


Related Story:
Australian Syrians call for end to bloodshed


Related Story:
Syrian embassies stormed after Homs 'massacre'


Related Story:
Russia, China block UN vote on Syria


Related Story:
At least 200 killed in latest Syrian bloodshed


Map: O'Malley 2606


The Syrian embassy in Canberra is calling on the Australian Government to
take swift action against those who ransacked the mission at the weekend.

A group of up to 40 men stormed the embassy in the southern Canberra suburb of
O'Malley about 9:30pm (AEDT).


Once inside, they smashed everything in sight on the ground floor of the building.
Three embassy staff took refuge in the basement.

Police are investigating the attack but no arrests have been made.


Syrian embassy charge d'affaires Jawdat Ali says the men also stole documents and computers.


"They broke the doors of the embassy, they broke the windows and they came
into the offices and they sabotaged. They broke some of the computers,
they broke some of the desks of the staffers," he said.


"I consider their action a terrorising action, a brutal action, a barbarian action,
and this action doesn't serve any purpose. It is an aimless action(???) and they
terrorised the people who were inside the embassy.


"This is a criminal act, an act that the Australian Government should deal with
in a serious way."


The attack on the embassy came as Russia and China vetoed a UN Security
Council resolution calling on Syrian president Bashar al-Assad to stand down.


Several Syrian consulates were also attacked around the world, including in
London, Berlin, Cairo and Kuwait.


Mr Ali says he does not know who the men were or what they stand for.

"We think they are from Sydney, they are extremists. We heard their
slogans, extremist slogans. This is why we expect that majority of them
are not Syrians, they are from different nationalities," he said.


Mr Ali says the incident was a criminal act committed on foreign soil.

"I am expecting that the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Australian Government,
responds seriously to this issue," he said.


"This act isn't just against
the Syrian government,
it is against the Australian Government,
it is against Australian law,

against international law too."


Topics:
world-politics,
vandalism,
activism-and-lobbying,
foreign-affairs,
omalley-2606,
act,
syrian-arab-republic

First posted
February 06, 2012 09:15:01
true lilly wrote:
Britain plays down Falkland Islands moves
by:From correspondents in London
From:AFP

February 06, 2012
7:22AM


BRITAIN has sought to play down military moves around the Falkland
Islands, as the foreign minister refused to comment on reports it has
moved a nuclear submarine to the tense South Atlantic.


Britain's Daily Mail newspaper on Saturday claimed Prime Minister David Cameron
has personally approved plans to send one of the Royal Navy's most advanced
Trafalgar-class nuclear submarines to the disputed archipelago.


Speaking on Sky News overnight, Foreign Secretary William Hague
declined to confirm or deny the deployment.


"We don't normally make any comment on the deployment of our submarines,"
he said. "But our naval vessels regularly visit the South Atlantic."


Argentina's defence minister, Arturo Puricelli, on Saturday described the reported
deployment as an "unnecessary display of firepower".


Tension has soared between the two countries in recent weeks as the thirtieth
anniversary of a brief but violent war over the windswept islands approaches.


Related Coverage

Prince William, the second in line to the British throne, this week
began a six-week mission with the Royal Air Force (RAF) in the
Falklands, a move that has infuriated Argentina.


The 29-year-old has been sent to the archipelago as part of his duties as
an RAF Sea King helicopter pilot, a deployment Britain says is routine but
Argentina has slammed as a "provocation".


Britain has further ratcheted tensions by announcing that it is to send HMS Dauntless,
a state-of-the-art warship, to the South Atlantic.


Mr Hague overnight dismissed the deployments as "entirely routine military movements".

"Prince William is also on a routine deployment that is part of his job," he added.
"We will resist the diplomatic efforts of Argentina to raise the temperature on this."


The Falklands, known as Las Malvinas in Spanish,
have been held by Britain since 1833 but are also claimed by Argentina.


On April 2, 1982, the then-ruling junta in Argentina invaded the
Falklands, sparking a 74-day war with Britain that cost the lives of
649 Argentine and 255 British troops.


London retained control and has vowed to defend the islands as long as
the inhabitants want to be part of Britain.
____________________

Flying into a storm -
Argentina furious at Prince William's Falklands tour

The Daily Telegraph
February 06, 2012
12:00AM


Diplomatic tensions ... RAF helicopter pilot Prince William.
Source: The Daily Telegraph
___________________________________________

Egypt to put foreign NGO workers on trial
EGYPT is to try 44 people
over the alleged illegal funding of aid groups,

a judicial source said yesterday,
a day after Washington said it would review aid to Cairo
over the crackdown.
Read more

Egypt clashes rage into fourth day
PROTESTERS and police have fought pitched battles
at security headquarters in Cairo
as deadly clashes raged into a fourth day. Read more

US 'to boost' Special Forces in Afghanistan
THE US is planning a major shift in its Afghanistan military strategy,
with reports Special Forces troops will take greater responsibility. Read more

Officials urge diplomatic break with Syria
ARAB leaders and officials have attacked the UN
after Russia and China blocked a resolution
condemning the Damascus regime. Read more

'Signs' of gas in offshore Israel field
AN Israeli company yesterday said it had discovered
"significant signs of natural gas"
after drilling off the country's Mediterranean coast,
in a report to theTel Aviv stock market. Read more

Military takes over in Brazil state as homicides soar
Homicides soar in Brazil state after police strike

Police strike sparks crime wave in Brazil state
Posted 6 minutes ago


Brazilian security forces have taken over in Bahia

after a police strike led to a spike in murders and other violent crimes.

Topics:

law-crime-and-justice, crime, brazil

Mexico police find decapitated women
POLICE in northern Mexico have found the decapitated bodies of two women
with missing index fingers, a sign among drug gangs that they believed the
victims were informants.
Read more


Death toll at 16 in Dominican boat wreck
THE death toll from the capsizing of a boat trying to take some 70 migrants
from the Dominican Republic to Puerto Rico has risen to 16, authorities said today.

Read more
China bans airlines from paying EU carbon
by:From correspondents in Beijing
From:AFP
February 06, 2012
12:03PM
CHINA'S airlines are banned from paying charges
on carbon emissions imposed by the European Union.

The official Xinhua news agency reported the ban today,
quoting the Civil Aviation Administration of China.

The EU imposed the tax
with effect from January 1
,
but more than two dozen countries, including
India, Russia, China and the United States,
have opposed
the move, saying
it violates international law.


"China's airlines are
not allowed to pay a charge on carbon emissions
imposed by the Europe Union, and
neither to hike freights nor to add other fees

accordingly in absence of government permission,"

Xinhua quoted the body as saying.

No one at the Civil Aviation Administration of China
was immediately available for comment, but Beijing has said repeatedly
that it opposes the new EU scheme, which Chinese state media has said
would lead to a "trade war"
in the sector.

The China Air Transport Association, which represents the country's airlines,
said last month the government was considering "countermeasures",
without giving any details.

The EU launched
the ETS (emissions trading scheme) in 2005 in a bid
to reduce carbon emissions of power stations and industrial plants.

It decided to include airlines, responsible for three per cent of global emissions,
in the system in the absence of a global agreement to cap aviation emissions.

Airlines that refuse to comply could be fined
with the possibility of being denied the right to land
in the 27-nation EU
in extreme cases, the bloc has said.
avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:02 pm


(GAY) Greens Leader Bob Brown says
PM Julia Gillard deserves a break from 'sexist' criticism.

Getty Images

Results: Election call

Should Prime Minister Gillard
call an election?


Yes: 83.39% (8723 votes)
No
: 16.61% (1738 votes)

Total votes: 10462

__________________________________

Results: Top job


Should Kevin Rudd challenge Julia Gillard
for Australia's top job?


Yes
: 61.82% (5286 votes)

No
: 38.18% (3265 votes)

Total votes: 8551


Hawke's helping hand for Julia
Gillard jumps at shadows
Labor's top job a Ruddy big mess
Labor's top job a Ruddy big mess

PM criticism 'sexist' - Brown

1:09PM
Matt Johnston and Phillip Hudson


UPDATE:

GREENS leader Bob Brown says Julia Gillard
cops too much "sexist and unfair" criticism
and should be given a break.

259 comments on this story

Poll: Does the PM cop more flak because she's a woman?

Results: Gillard sexism debate

Does Julia Gillard receive more
than her fair share
of criticism because she's a woman?


Yes: 26.9% (170 votes)

No
: 73.81% (479 votes)
Total votes: 649


___________________________________________

Should Prime Minister Gillard call an election?

Yes:82.93% (9713 votes)
No: 17.07% (1999 votes)
Total votes: 11712
avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Sun Feb 05, 2012 8:23 pm

Vanuatu jolted by several quakes

VANUATU continues to be jolted
by several moderate to strong earthquakes
after a magnitude 7.1 quake hit last week.

Read more
avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  AV-IT on Sun Feb 05, 2012 8:32 pm

Hello true lilly, are you familiar with the below article ?


Is New Oz PM Head of Satanist Lodge?

by Henry Makow Ph. D


In a dramatic coup June 24 2010, Julia Gillard took over as Prime Minister from Kevin Rudd and became Australia's first female PM.

Gillard is the first PM to be unmarried and a lesbian. (She is in a relationship with Tim Mathieson - who is a "beard.") She is the first PM to be sworn in without making reference to God. (Gillard is an atheist and has no religious beliefs.)

A reader has suggested that Gillard is head of the Satanic Alpha lodge of Sydney ("Australia`s global satanic legacy and future.")

This is based on the of a leading Australian Satanist "Frater 616": posthumous confessions

"Some of the deadliest, most effective and disarming assassins are women. Within the Alpha Lodges they are worshipped as embodiments of the Dark Goddess - who is known by many names and is virgin still! Currently the Outer Head of the Alpha Lodge Australasia is a very highly placed and successful Federal politician - whose Satanic name is Bestia."

We asked Aloysius Fozdyke, (the man who brought Frater 616's testimony to the world,) to comment. He is a member of the Alpha Lodge and we assume acts with their authorization.

His reply on the "Bestia"-Gillard connection: " I'd rather not comment at this stage."

Our reader continues, "there is only one female politician in Australia who fits "Frater 616"`s allusions to a "t"; and that person is Julia Gillard."

He says, "a closer study of photos of Julia Gillard (as well as ... European High Commissioner Herman van Rompuy, btw) clearly point to psycho-pathological traits - in Ms Gillard`s case those of the sadistic personality type. I would therefore venture the claim that Ms. Gillard is not only "a communist lesbian", but that she is in fact the head of the Satanic Alpha lodge - the "Bestia" mentioned by Frater 616; and the very person whose predilection is ritual child abuse."

Our reader continues:"In the same manner as Mr. van Rompuy has been placed at the very epicentre of European power (by his handlers Brzezinski and Kissinger; who "just happened to dine with him" in Belgium, on the very night of his election in November 2009.)"

"Ms. Gillard has now been placed in control of the south-east Asian region, quite possibly in preparation for the soon-to-be implementation of specific "new rules of societal conduct"...to be dictated by these very circles."

"Please also note these further clues: 1) Ms. Gillard is childless; although she obviously "enjoys" (as previous minister of education) concerning herself with children, she does not (as stated in an ABC interview of 2009) "especially like them".

"2) Ms. Gillard is "an atheist". Oh really? this might not be wholly dishonest, but actually a half-truth: if Ms. Gillard`s master is Satan ("the lord of this world"), as I would suggest, then she is -true to her beliefs- simply "hiding" this fact "in plain sight", as Satanists are wont to do.

"3) Ms. Gillard came to power very suddenly and in a most conniving "unusual" fashion; this would seem to point to hidden strings being pulled; strings such as those found in secret societies and brought to bear at the crucial time - and with deadly force. Further "enjoyment" is then drawn from the distress and shock of the opponent; in our case from the tearful downfall of Kevin Rudd (who would seem as decent a human being as they come, in the guise of politicians anyway.)

4) Ms Gillard is currently the only "highly placed and successful federal (female) politician"...her curriculum vitae, her views, as well as her highly suspect private life and "preferences" fit Frater 616`s description perfectly. all said, I`m sure that by following this admittedly still rather basic line of enquiry, others (perhaps more at home in Australian politics) will be able to add further evidence to my thesis.

In conclusion, the thesis that Gillard is the Head of an important Satanic Lodge is consistent with the claims made by both Frater 616 and Fozdyke that leading members of society, especially politicians, are Satanists. The fact that Fozdyke declines to comment is significant.

Here is the rest of the original article by "Matt" on Gillard. She certainly fits the profile in light of the occult and satanic roots of Communism and Lesbianism:

She was sworn in by Australia's first female Governor General (Quentin Bryce.) Bryce has held numerous high offices with the aim of advancing women's and "minority" rights at the expense of the Australia's European majority. Bryce's daughter is married to Bill Shorten who was pivotal in binging Gillard into the office of PM.

When she was at high school, Gillard was mentored by the Jewish liberal (i.e. Communist) Marlene Pilowski. When she moved to Melbourne to attend university, she became the Education Vice President of the left wing (i.e. Communist) AUS (Australian Union of Students), and later was its President.

Gillard was in the Socialist Forum from her university days. The forum's objectives were to create a socialist / feminist society through Labor governments. It originally consisted of ex-members of the Victorian branch of the Communist Party and some ALP members. Gillard was one of the two original paid organizers of the Forum. She wrote numerous documents for the Socialist Forum including 'Being a Socialist Teacher' and 'Future Directions of the Left'. It was also through the Forum that she met Labor heavy-weight Joan Kirner and worked closely with her on Labor's Affirmative Action Plan. Gillard wrote the constitution for the pro-abortion feminist organization EMILY's List (in Australia), which supports "progressive" Labor women.

In 2006, when in opposition, Gillard voted for legalizing the abortion pill RU486 and for stem cell research, which both became law. In March 2010, when she was Education Minister, Senator Ron Boswell said that "Julia Gillard's new [education] curriculum reads like a learners manual for international socialism".

As PM, Gillard has tried to assuage Australians by painting herself as a moderate. She has also distanced herself from Rudd, who had become the fall-guy for a bad government. Gillard however should take more blame as she was one of the "gang of 4" that made the decisions. She was directly behind the Building Education Revolution (BER) scandal over building unneeded overpriced schhools.

In less than three years, the Labor Government has gone from a 20 billion dollar surplus (left by Howard) to 148 billion debt, and is borrowing an extra $150 million every day. The common theme in Federal and state politics is that Labor governments create massive debt, and the Conservatives (Liberal / National party governments) pay that debt off. The main point though is missed - governments shouldn't be borrowing or repaying money from off-shore lenders in the first place.

Before holding the next general election (probably this year), Gillard wll have to straighten out 3 key policy areas. She compromised on the mining tax, which was originally introduced by Rudd to pay off debt. With her dodgy projection figures, she claimed it would bring the budget back into the black, but this is unlikely.

The second issue, that of the "boat people". Boat arrivals have increased at over 50 times the rate under Howard because of Rudd's loose regulations. Boat people are considered queue jumpers. Gillard said that they will be processed in East Timor although there is no centre there. She is ignoring the centre already built at Nauru. Gusmao, the PM of East Timor claims he wasn't consulted and didn't want a centre in his country.

The third issue is the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS.) Rudd initially pushed it hard, but it was defeated in the Senate. The average Australian didn't really understand what it was, but many have since woken up that it is essentially a big expense which will effect ordinary people. The ETS is not about saving the environment so much as social change and the redistribution of wealth.
Gillard who has painted herself to be a bit of a non-scary moderate, is red at the centre. The media distracts and woos the dumb masses with news about about her latest haircuts, etc (her gay boyfriend Mathieson is a hairdresser.) It is her aim however to re-engineer society, but years of the Left's influence in Labor governments, education and the media has already done that.

As PM, Gillard just looks like another version of Rudd. Pretending to listen to the people, she instead pushes the NWO agenda. Being a non-religious 50 year old woman in a de-facto relationship is nothing unusual in Australia anymore. Gillard simply mirrors what Australia already is, while helping to push it ever closer to extinction in the name of "tolerance."

Original article here
avatar
AV-IT

Posts : 48
Join date : 2012-02-01
Location : On Me Bak

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Sun Feb 05, 2012 8:43 pm

AV-IT wrote:Hello true lilly, are you familiar with the below article ?
Are 'you' familiar with...

But, this has been a good Government for AUSTRALIANS,
in that it has well and truly shown us that it isn't,
'The Yellow Peril', or 'Reds under the beds',
that screw over this Uniquely Glorious Land,
but, 'The GREEN with ENVY, PINKS, lacing our drinks'...
while BANNING us from using OUR CLEAN WATER,
until the whole land is so sodden, that even light rains
have nowhere to go but through OUR HOMES!


(GAY) Greens Leader Bob Brown says
PM Julia Gillard deserves a break from 'sexist' criticism.

Getty Images

Results: Election call

Should Prime Minister Gillard
call an election?


Yes: 83.39% (8723 votes)
No
: 16.61% (1738 votes)

Total votes: 10462

__________________________________

Results: Top job


Should Kevin Rudd challenge Julia Gillard
for Australia's top job?


Yes
: 61.82% (5286 votes)

No
: 38.18% (3265 votes)

Total votes: 8551


Hawke's helping hand for Julia
Gillard jumps at shadows
Labor's top job a Ruddy big mess
Labor's top job a Ruddy big mess

PM criticism 'sexist' - Brown

1:09PM
Matt Johnston and Phillip Hudson


UPDATE:

GREENS leader Bob Brown says Julia Gillard
cops too much "sexist and unfair" criticism
and should be given a break.

259 comments on this story

Poll: Does the PM cop more flak because she's a woman?

Results: Gillard sexism debate

Does Julia Gillard receive more
than her fair share
of criticism because she's a woman?


Yes: 26.9% (170 votes)

No
: 73.81% (479 votes)
Total votes: 649


___________________________________________

Should Prime Minister Gillard call an election?

Yes:82.93% (9713 votes)
No: 17.07% (1999 votes)
Total votes: 11712


But, this has been a good Government for AUSTRALIANS,
in that it has well and truly shown us that it isn't,
'The Yellow Peril', or 'Reds under the beds',
that screw over this Uniquely Glorious Land,
but, 'The GREEN with ENVY, PINKS, lacing our drinks'...
while BANNING us from using OUR CLEAN WATER,
until the whole land is so sodden, that even light rains
have nowhere to go but through OUR HOMES!


...and now there's a rock 'you' should scurry under,
if 'you' have the brain to figure what I mean.
avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  AV-IT on Sun Feb 05, 2012 8:51 pm

NO I AM NOT . . . Are you one of those idiots that fall on their knees to that fake Winsor Queen?

here learn something about your beloved Australia.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maXEbXndKjQ
avatar
AV-IT

Posts : 48
Join date : 2012-02-01
Location : On Me Bak

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  daddlepoms on Sun Feb 05, 2012 9:16 pm

Tisha B'Av

Tel Aviv

The A.V

avatar
daddlepoms

Posts : 651
Join date : 2010-06-26
Location : three's a crowd but four's allowed

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  Billy Ruben on Sun Feb 05, 2012 10:24 pm

AV-IT wrote:NO I AM NOT . . . Are you one of those idiots that fall on their knees to that fake Winsor Queen?

here learn something about your beloved Australia.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maXEbXndKjQ


Ummm....Yes,she is.

There's whole threads and 50 spammed post a day,when the royals hit the headlines,you'll suffer for it too,now that you released your displeasure about that.You'll be the new initiate into our secret,sort of semi,not so secret cabal,Tintins International Cabal For Inept Assassins.

We sit around,hack computers,read emails,corrupt post and blow up cars.24/7 resources and think-tanks all trained to "Off" True Lillys light.

We all so enjoy tea with scones and sit around the log fire catching up on the gossip for the week.Train cub-scouts for nefarious deeds,turn girl-guides into spies,when they sell chocolates full of intestinal cameras,so we can monitor True Lillys shit capacity for the week.

Oh,we're organised.


jawdrop wacky catfight boobies dizzy satan

avatar
Billy Ruben

Posts : 8074
Join date : 2010-03-29
Location : No Fixed Address

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:34 pm

More laws to discriminate against freedom




Andrew Bolt – Monday, February 06, 12 (07:06 am)





Yet more evidence that many “discrimination” laws are becoming a racket, exploiting the fact that the process is the punishment:





<blockquote>BUSINESS is demanding Labor dump a proposal to model
new anti-discrimination laws on a key pillar of the Fair Work Act that
has already burdened employers with a surge in speculative claims designed to force costly payouts.


The government is developing a single anti-discrimination law to meet an
election promise to prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sexual
orientation and “gender identity”, as well as to consolidate a mishmash
of laws on race, sex, disability and age discrimination.


In submissions obtained by The Australian, business groups warn of the
potential for a major extension of what is deemed to be discrimination,
and that this could move ahead of generally accepted community
standards…


The Australian Industry Group warns that the Fair Work Act has “made it
far too easy for employees to pursue speculative claims aimed at
achieving a monetary settlement during conciliation”.



The Business Council of Australia warns that the laws are “being used to
undermine internal grievance and performance management processes, and
are having a deleterious effect on the communication between supervisors
and employees”.


</blockquote>

(Subscription required.)










51 comments |
Permalink

Brown now denies what he once said: that Gillard broke her word




Andrew Bolt – Tuesday, February 07, 12 (05:48 am)





Was Bob Brown deceiving us then about the deceiving Julia Gillard, or his he deceiving us now?



On January 11, Greens leader Brown accused the Prime Minister of
breaking her “absolute commitment” to a forestry deal he had earlier
described as ”shameful”:



<blockquote>

BOB BROWN: Those areas have not been protected. The logging has
continued. In fact when I spoke to the Prime Minister about this in
December, despite her absolute commitment to an immediate end to all logging to these high conservation value forests many
months earlier, over 10 square kilometres of these forests had been
flattened by Forestry Tasmania, largely for the giant marauding
Malaysian company Ta Ann.


STEPHEN DZIEDZIC: Logging is happening in less than 1 per cent, though,
of the 430,000 hectares that are protected in order to fulfil existing
contracts. Are you refusing to compromise here?


BOB BROWN: No I’m wanting the Prime Minister to keep her word.
... And the commitment was, under section 27 of the agreement the Prime
Minister and Premier Giddings signed, that if there was a need to
fulfil contracts to find wood in these areas, then the Commonwealth
would compensate.



The Prime Minister and the Premier signed off on it but then they stood
limply aside while Forestry Tasmania, in the service of this Malaysian
corporation Ta Ann, has simply continued to destroy these magnificent
parts of Australia’s World Her- what should be World Heritage.

</blockquote>


On January 13, he repeated his allegation that Gillard had broken her word:


<blockquote>Many Australians will feel very aggrieved - not just that there is a breach of honour involved here by the Premier and the Prime Minister - but at the destruction of these great, wild forests.
</blockquote>

On January 16 he made clear he was talking about a promise made by Gillard, and broken by her:


<blockquote>On Friday, Forestry Tasmania, the extremist loggers
outfit which has trashed the Gillard commitment, stated that these
coupes (logging areas) represent less than half of one per cent of the
total area identified for interim protection… Today, the prime minister is using the same statistic to justify her own renege on the promise.

</blockquote>

But forget all that.



Now Bob Brown wants to rescue the drowning Gillard by accusing people who criticise her of being “sexist”. And last night he denied Gillard had broken her word on the forestry deal:


<blockquote>BOB BROWN: Somebody had to form government in this
minority situation. She had the gumption to do it and the wherewithal to
do it and she stuck by her work with the Greens in delivering. And as
Tony Windsor said ...


EMMA ALBERICI: Not entirely though. Not on logging in Tasmania.


BOB BROWN: That wasn’t in that agreement with me. That’s an agreement she made with the Tasmanian Premier and ...


EMMA ALBERICI: Which she has betrayed?



BOB BROWN: No, which has been betrayed by Forestry Tasmania,
which is a Rambo organisation out of control where the Premier of
Tasmania Lara Giddings needs to bring them back into control.

</blockquote>

Brown now absolving Gillard after earlier damning her suggests to me
that his attacks on her credibility over logging were insincere, and
little more than a ploy to manufacture some dispute between the Greens
and Labor, to the political advantage of both.



But now that Brown may lose his meal ticket in the pliant PM, he tries
to erase from our memory his own charge that she breaks her promise.






Is Bob Brown sexist by defending Gillard like this?




Andrew Bolt – Monday, February 06, 12 (12:20 pm)





Greens leader Bob Brown
makes one of the silliest interventions yet in Labor’s leadership
battle in a desperate bid to preserve his meal ticket:


<blockquote>GREENS leader Bob Brown says criticism of Julia Gillard is sexist and unfair
“Quite a bit of the criticism is sexist and unfair and unrelenting and
the Prime Minister needs a bit of a break from that,” he told
journalists in Canberra.

</blockquote>

What, “quite a bit” of the criticism is sexist and unfair? To criticise
her extraordinary deceits and bropken promises, for instance, is now
sexist? To criticise her for her lethal bungling of boat people
policy, the crippling of live cattle exports, the fire--starting of mini
race riots, the mass rorting of the school hall program, her attacks on
the free press and free speech and so much more is proof of the
critics’ “sexism”? By the way, did Brown ever call for John Howard to be
given “a bit of a break” from the far more furious criticism he was
given by the media? Why not? Is Brown perhaps sexist?



Brown continues:


<blockquote>“I just think the degree of relentless criticism on
this Prime Minister coming from male commentators, it’s probably all
subconscious, but is sexist and quite ridiculous at times.”

</blockquote>

I’m puzzled. When some of those male commentators praised Gillard, were they sexist then? Or are we only sexist now that we’re criticising her for the deceit and incompetence since? And when female commentators criticise Gillard in exactly the same terms as we men, why doesn’t Brown call them sexist, too? Or is Brown perhaps sexist?



On he goes:



<blockquote>He said voters believed Ms Gillard had
handled herself well in difficult circumstances. “People are incredibly
impressed with her ability to deal with what is chucked at her, and so
am I,” he said.

</blockquote>


“Incredibly impressed”? In fact, the latest Newspoll has satisfaction
with Gillard falling from 36 per cent before Christmas to 33 per cent,
with dissatisfaction with her steady on 55 per cent. Is Brown perhaps a
fantasist as well as sexist?




This bit will stun you:





<blockquote>Senator Brown criticised independent MP Andrew
Wilkie, saying the House of Representatives crossbencher had been
“naïve” to make the passage of poker machine reforms a condition of his
support for Labor, which he had now rescinded.


“We didn’t ask for commitments, for example, to ensure that a parliament
pass an issue in a period of minority government,” he said.



“I think that was going a step too far. How can you ask a minority government to ensure that a parliament passes anything?”

</blockquote>

What, like a carbon dioxide tax? Here’s Brown signing the infamous
leadership deal with Gillard that ensured her the Greens support, and
had her disastrously breaking her election promise not to impose the tax
that only the Greens demanded:




.




Brown is a sexist, a fantasist and the most brazen hypocrite. If he expects voters to buy this stuff, he’s also a fool.




He also has an undeclared vested interest in the Labor battle - a Greens
patsy as Prime Minister would suit him best. Michelle Grattan explains:


<blockquote>Rudd PM would be urged by some colleagues to more sharply differentiate the government from the Greens. The Liberal claim that Bob Brown is the real PM is biting in the electorate, according to Labor MPs.



Having a stoush with the Greens would not be particularly dangerous for Rudd.

</blockquote>


The more Brown argues for Gillard, the clearer he advertises that Gillard is a Greens stooge.



UPDATE



Reader AC:


<blockquote>On second read, maybe he’s saying Rudd is a sexist.
</blockquote>








79 comments |
Permalink


Albrecht: Who is an Aborigine?




Andrew Bolt – Tuesday, February 07, 12 (12:21 am)






Paul Albrecht AM in his new book asks an interesting question on which I make no comment:





<blockquote>
When I began my ministry in central Australia in the late 1950s, only
people of full Aboriginal descent were categorised as Aborigines. At the
same time, they were declared to be wards of the state so that special
assistance could be provided…


On the other hand, people whose ancestry included a person or persons of
Aboriginal ancestry and another race, for example, Caucasian, Chinese,
Afghan, were not classed as Aborigines, and therefore not wards of the
state. They were Australian citizens who could vote, own property, drink
in a pub, buy alcohol, etc. At that time, many of these people of mixed
Aboriginal/Caucasian or Chinese or Afghan descent took umbrage if they
were referred to as Aborigines.



Later, when a change of government policy provided benefits to
Aborigines not available to other Australians, but without the
restrictions which previously had applied to Aboriginal people, many of
these same people chose to identify as Aborigines…



The powers of the Commonwealth to make laws on behalf of Aborigines, and
provide special funds for Aborigines in areas of health, housing,
education, economic development, etc., meant there was also the need for
an Australia-wide definition of who was an Aborigine. In the event, the
Commonwealth adopted the following definition, based on race:


<blockquote>

An Aborigine is a person descended from the original inhabitants of this
land, who chooses to identify as an Aborigine, and who is accepted as
such by his/her group…</blockquote>
The current definition makes it clear who is an Aborigine, for legal
purposes, and therefore eligible for the special assistance provided by
governments for Aborigines only… However, the definition says nothing
about Aboriginal culture, or the cultural differences between the more
traditional Aborigines and those who have lost much, if not all, of
their culture… (This) has helped to father a number of negative
consequences. For example:


<blockquote>It has helped create monochromatic policies and programmes. While some
of these have been appropriate and helpful to Aborigines who have lost
their culture, they have been unhelpful to, in fact they have often been
harmful to, the more traditional Aborigines…




It has helped to gloss over the fact that there are fundamental cultural
differences between Aborigines whose attitudes, lifestyles, and values
have been fundamentally shaped by their traditional culture, and those
who have lost their traditional language and culture, and whose
attitudes, lifestyles and values have been shaped, either by their
experience of living among other Australians as Australians, or by their
experience of living on the fringes of Australian society, and not
being accepted by Australians.


It has helped gloss over the fact that while both the more traditional
and some non-traditional Aborigines have needs, these needs differ
greatly…




It has helped to silence the voice of the more traditional Aborigines.
In traditional Aboriginal societies, only designated leaders could speak
on behalf of their group, and these leaders always represented only
themselves… Yet the government chose to ignore this cultural fact ... .
Rather, a small group of Aborigines, who by and large had no knowledge
of traditional Aboriginal culture and didn’t speak an Aboriginal
language, but who had learnt to manipulate the system established by
Parliament, succeeded in influencing policy and effectively setting the
whole agenda for Australian and Aboriginal relations.
</blockquote>

I believe it can be shown both empirically and statistically, that the
Aborigines who have benefited most from current Government programmes
are the Aborigines who have lost their traditional culture, and whose
values and lifestyle approximate those of other Australians
.


</blockquote>






(Apologies, but we cannot accept readers’ comments. But please read on at the link.)


They want Australia without the Australians?




Andrew Bolt – Tuesday, February 07, 12 (12:05 am)





They are mad, of
course. Leave it to our multiculturalists - or, more accurately,
cultural separatists - and we will soon share nothing but an address:

<blockquote>WORK on a $900 million Korean suburb on Hobart’s Eastern Shore will start within a year after winning final planning approval yesterday.


Billed as an “integrated lifestyle, education, and residential
development”, ParanVille will be one of the biggest residential
subdivisions developed in the state and promises to give the struggling
building industry a massive boost.


It is expected to attract residents from Korea, China and Japan who are
keen to escape harsh northern winters and the threat of nuclear
accidents, its backers said yesterday.



The 158-hectare rural site between Howrah and Rokeby approved by the
Tasmanian Planning Commission will become home to more than 2000 new
residents and several hundred language students and will generate up to
1000 jobs during the 10-year construction period.




</blockquote>

(Thanks to reader Daniel.)





true lilly wrote:
AV-IT wrote:Hello true lilly, are you familiar with the below article ?
Are 'you' familiar with...

But, this has been a good Government for AUSTRALIANS,
in that it has well and truly shown us that it isn't,
'The Yellow Peril', or 'Reds under the beds',
that screw over this Uniquely Glorious Land,
but, 'The GREEN with ENVY, PINKS, lacing our drinks'...
while BANNING us from using OUR CLEAN WATER,
until the whole land is so sodden, that even light rains
have nowhere to go but through OUR HOMES!


(GAY) Greens Leader Bob Brown says
PM Julia Gillard deserves a break from 'sexist' criticism.

Getty Images

Results: Election call

Should Prime Minister Gillard
call an election?


Yes: 83.39% (8723 votes)
No
: 16.61% (1738 votes)

Total votes: 10462

__________________________________

Results: Top job


Should Kevin Rudd challenge Julia Gillard
for Australia's top job?


Yes
: 61.82% (5286 votes)

No
: 38.18% (3265 votes)

Total votes: 8551


Hawke's helping hand for Julia
Gillard jumps at shadows
Labor's top job a Ruddy big mess
Labor's top job a Ruddy big mess

PM criticism 'sexist' - Brown

1:09PM
Matt Johnston and Phillip Hudson


UPDATE:

GREENS leader Bob Brown says Julia Gillard
cops too much "sexist and unfair" criticism
and should be given a break.

259 comments on this story

Poll: Does the PM cop more flak because she's a woman?

Results: Gillard sexism debate

Does Julia Gillard receive more
than her fair share
of criticism because she's a woman?


Yes: 26.9% (170 votes)

No
: 73.81% (479 votes)
Total votes: 649


___________________________________________

Should Prime Minister Gillard call an election?

Yes:82.93% (9713 votes)
No: 17.07% (1999 votes)
Total votes: 11712


But, this has been a good Government for AUSTRALIANS,
in that it has well and truly shown us that it isn't,
'The Yellow Peril', or 'Reds under the beds',
that screw over this Uniquely Glorious Land,
but, 'The GREEN with ENVY, PINKS, lacing our drinks'...
while BANNING us from using OUR CLEAN WATER,
until the whole land is so sodden, that even light rains
have nowhere to go but through OUR HOMES!


...and now there's a rock 'you' should scurry under,
if 'you' have the brain to figure what I mean.
avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Mon Feb 06, 2012 3:43 pm

Gee, 'you' Mob really have no answer for this thread, do 'you';

Aboriginal Stonehenge: Stargazing in ancient Australia

No wonder 'you' buried it


Anyway, back to that "time, times and half a time" thing
that preaching, The 'out of Egypt' Apostasy, attempts to
hide, even from 'the very elect', whom 'they' can't deceive.

Oz=O'Zion, Antarctica=Lebanon, AS GOD DESCRIBE OF and
From The Beginning, so that we could also SEE ALL HIS
WARNINGS and PROMISES, right to 'the end', BEING FULFILLED.

2 KINGS 19:

23-
I shall certainly ascend the height of mountainous regions,
The remotest parts of Leb´a·non;
And I shall cut down its lofty cedars, its choice juniper trees.
And I will enter its final lodging place, the forest of its orchard.

24
I myself shall certainly dig and drink strange waters,
And I shall dry up with the soles of my feet all the Nile canals of Egypt.

(NO, it does NOT say that, but: the rivers 2975 of besieged places 4693.)
Now I DARE you, to read The Full, Descriptive Meanings
of EVERY WORD:

http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=2Ki&c=19&v=1&t=KJV#1

1
And it came about that as soon as King Hez·e·ki´ah
heard, he immediately ripped his garments apart and covered himself
with sackcloth and came into the house of Jehovah.
2
Further, he sent E·li´a·kim, who was over the
household, and Sheb´nah the secretary and the older men of the priests
covered with sackcloth to Isaiah the prophet the son of A´moz.
3
And they proceeded to say to him: “This is what
Hez·e·ki´ah has said, ‘This day is a day of distress and of rebuke and
of scornful insolence; for the sons have come as far as the womb’s
mouth, and there is no power to give birth.
4
Perhaps Jehovah your God will hear all the words
of Rab´sha·keh, whom the king of As·syr´i·a his lord sent to taunt the
living God, and he will actually call him to account for the words that
Jehovah your God has heard. And you must lift up prayer in behalf of the
remnant that are to be found.’”


5
So the servants of King Hez·e·ki´ah came in to Isaiah.
6
Then Isaiah said to them: “This is what YOU should say to YOUR
lord, ‘This is what Jehovah has said: “Do not be afraid because of the
words that you have heard with which the attendants of the king of
As·syr´i·a spoke abusively of me.
7
Here I am putting a spirit in him, and he must
hear a report and return to his own land; and I shall certainly cause
him to fall by the sword in his own land.”’”


8
After that Rab´sha·keh returned and found the king
of As·syr´i·a fighting against Lib´nah; for he had heard that he had
pulled away from La´chish.
9
He heard it said respecting Tir·ha´kah the king of
E·thi·o´pi·a: “Here he has come out to fight against you.” Therefore he
sent messengers again to Hez·e·ki´ah, saying:
10
“This is what YOU men
should say to Hez·e·ki´ah the king of Judah, ‘Do not let your God in
whom you are trusting deceive you, saying: “Jerusalem will not be given
into the hand of the king of As·syr´i·a.”
11
Look! You yourself have heard what the kings of
As·syr´i·a did to all the lands by devoting them to destruction; and
will you yourself be delivered?
12
Have the gods of the nations that my forefathers
brought to ruin delivered them, even Go´zan and Ha´ran and Re´zeph and
the sons of E´den that were in Tel-as´sar?
13
Where is he—the king of Ha´math and the king of Ar´pad and the king of the cities of Seph·ar·va´im, He´na and Iv´vah?’”


14
Then Hez·e·ki´ah took the letters out of the hand
of the messengers and read them, after which Hez·e·ki´ah went up to the
house of Jehovah and spread it out before Jehovah.
15
And Hez·e·ki´ah began to pray before Jehovah and
say: “O Jehovah the God of Israel, sitting upon the cherubs, you alone
are the [true] God of all the kingdoms of the earth. You yourself have
made the heavens and the earth.
16
Incline your ear, O Jehovah, and hear. Open your
eyes, O Jehovah, and see, and hear the words of Sen·nach´er·ib that he
has sent to taunt the living God.
17
It is a fact, O Jehovah, the kings of As·syr´i·a have devastated the nations and their land.
18
And they have consigned their gods to the fire,
because they were no gods, but the workmanship of man’s hands, wood and
stone; so that they destroyed them.
19
And now, O Jehovah our God, save us, please, out
of his hand, that all the kingdoms of the earth may know that you, O
Jehovah, are God alone.”


20
And Isaiah the son of A´moz proceeded to send to
Hez·e·ki´ah, saying: “This is what Jehovah the God of Israel has said,
‘The prayer that you have made to me concerning Sen·nach´er·ib the king
of As·syr´i·a I have heard.
21
This is the word that Jehovah has spoken against him:


“The virgin daughter of Zion has despised you, she has held you in derision.
Behind you the daughter of Jerusalem has wagged her head.


22
Whom have you taunted and spoken of abusively?
And against whom have you lifted up your voice
And do you raise your eyes on high?
It is against the Holy One of Israel!


23
By means of your messengers you have taunted Jehovah and you say,
‘With the multitude of my war chariots I myself—
I shall certainly ascend the height of mountainous regions,
The remotest parts of Leb´a·non;
And I shall cut down its lofty cedars, its choice juniper trees.
And I will enter its final lodging place, the forest of its orchard.


24
I myself shall certainly dig and drink strange waters,
And I shall dry up with the soles of my feet all the Nile canals of Egypt.

(NO, it does NOT say that, but: the rivers 2975 of besieged places 4693.)

25
Have you not heard? From remote times it is what I will do.
From bygone days I have even formed it.
Now I will bring it in.
And you will serve to make fortified cities desolate as piles of ruins.


26
And their inhabitants will be feeble-handed;
They will simply be terrified and will be ashamed.
They must become as vegetation of the field and green tender grass,
Grass of the roofs, when there is a scorching before the east wind.


27
And your sitting quiet and your going out and your coming in I well know,
And your exciting yourself against me,




28
Because your exciting yourself against me and your roaring have come up into my ears.
And I shall certainly put my hook in your nose and my bridle between your lips,
And I shall indeed lead you back by the way by which you have come.”


29
“‘And this will be the sign for you: There will
be an eating this year of the growth from spilled kernels, and in the
second year grain that shoots up of itself; but in the third year sow
seed, you people, and reap and plant vineyards and eat their fruitage.
30
And those who escape of the house of Judah, those who are left, will certainly take root downward and produce fruitage upward.
31
For out of Jerusalem a remnant will go forth, and
those who escape from Mount Zion. The very zeal of Jehovah of armies
will do this.


32
“‘That is why this is what Jehovah has said
concerning the king of As·syr´i·a: “He will not come into this city nor
will he shoot an arrow there nor confront it with a shield nor cast up a
siege rampart against it.
33
By the way by which he proceeded to come, he will return, and into this city he will not come, is the utterance of Jehovah.
34
And I shall certainly defend this city to save it for my own sake and for the sake of David my servant.”’”


35
And it came about on that night that the angel of
Jehovah proceeded to go out and strike down a hundred and eighty-five
thousand in the camp of the As·syr´i·ans. When people rose up early in
the morning, why, there all of them were dead carcasses.
36
Therefore Sen·nach´er·ib the king of As·syr´i·a pulled away and went and returned, and he took up dwelling in Nin´e·veh.
37
And it came about that as he was bowing down at
the house of Nis´roch his god, A·dram´me·lech and Shar·e´zer, his sons,
themselves struck him down with the sword, and they themselves escaped
to the land of Ar´a·rat. And E´sar-had´don his son began to reign in
place of him.
avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  MoMo on Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:39 am

http://www.preceptaustin.org/bible_maps.htm

wave thumbs up

The Table Of Nations: A Unique Document

http://custance.org/old/noah/ch1bh.html

Before giving consideration to these findings, it may be worth pointing out that the value of a document may change with time, so that it does not become more or less valuable, but rather valuable in an entirely new way. There is a sense in which Genesis 10 retains its unique worth as the first document to proclaim the unity of Man, just as the Magna Carta was the first document to proclaim the equality of Man. To say, as Thomas did, that the document is valueless, betrays an extraordinary narrowness of vision, by assuming that the only value a document can have is its use as a source of information for the historian. Historical veracity is one kind of value, but there are other values.

It should not for one moment, however, be supposed that we are relinquishing the historicity of this chapter in order to establish its value on another footing. The fact is, as we shall try to show, that wherever its statements can be sufficiently tested, Genesis 10 has been found completely accurate - often where, at one time, it seemed most certainly to be in error. This process of steady vindication has served to establish for it a second kind of value, namely, that like every other part of Scripture which has similarly been challenged and vindicated by research, it now contributes its testimony to the dependability of these earlier portions of Genesis, upon the truth of which hangs so much else of our faith.

Moreover, it is very difficult to conceive of the record of Genesis, which carries the thread of history from Adam until well into those ages supplied with monumental documents, without some kind of Table to set forth what happened to Noah's family and how the rest of the world, apart from the Middle East, came to be peopled after the Flood. The Table thus becomes an essential part of Scripture in its earliest portions, not merely for the satisfying of our natural curiosity, but to establish the fact that all men are of one blood, the offspring of the first Adam, and redeemable by the blood of one Man, the Second Adam.

The Table thus serves three purposes. It supplies an essential chapter in the early record of Genesis, rounding out what happened as the world's population expanded. It joins the whole human race into a single family, without giving the least suggestion that any one particular branch had preeminence over another - a notable achievement. Finally, as a purely historical document, it provides insights into the relationships between peoples that are only now becoming obtainable by other means, thereby adding its testimony to the dependability of the Genesis record..

Of the first of these achievements, Dillmann had this to say: (Cool

Egyptians and Phoenicians, Assyrians and Babylonians, even Indians and Persians, had a certain measure of geographical and ethnological knowledge, before more strictly scientific investigation had been begun among the classical peoples. From several of these, such as the Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, and Persians, surveys of enumerations of the peoples known to them and attempts at maps have come down to us in the written memorials they have left behind. But not much attention was paid, as a rule, to foreigners unless national and trade interests were at stake. Often enough they were despised as mere barbarians, and in no case were they included with the more cultured nations in a higher unity.

It is otherwise in our text. Here many with whom the Israelites had no sort of actual relationship are taken into consideration.

We are apt to be so familiar with the idea of the brotherhood of man, that we assume it to be a concept accepted by all races at all times throughout history. Occasionally, we observe in our own selves a certain hesitancy in according other nations who do not share our cultural values the full measure of humanness which we accord to members of our own society. Such feelings, however, are apt to be concealed as much as possible, since the proper thing nowadays is to support the heroic assumption that "all men are equal." But there are times when we can give vent to our true feelings in the matter, as for example, when we are at war. If the writer of the tenth chapter of Genesis was a Hebrew, it is likely that, for him, the Canaanites were a particularly despised and degraded subsection of the human race. We have an analogy in the status accorded to the Jewish people by the Nazis. To many Germans at that time, the Jews were not really human beings at all. It is all the more remarkable, therefore, that in this Table of Nations the Canaanites are given equal standing in this Pedigree of Man with the descendants of Eber, among whom the Jewish people are numbered.

In his commentary, Kalisch (9) points out that even the curse of Canaan seems to have been forgotten, and not the slightest hint of it appears in the record to remind the reader. On the contrary, no other tribe is enumerated with such complete detail as that of Canaan (verses 15-19). As this learned writer says, "Nothing disturbs the harmony of this grand genealogy."

In the face of this, it is really rather extraordinary that Driver should consider the document as a piece of Jewish propaganda.

One further point is worth mentioning. When a civilization reaches a very high level of development, there may come a clearer recognition that all men are blood brothers. However, in a very small, closely-knit community struggling to establish itself, there may tend to be a very different attitude. Among most primitive people, the habit is to call themselves (in their own language, of course)" true men," referring to all others by some term which clearly denies them the right to manhood at all. Thus the Naskapi call themselves Neneot, which means real people. The Chukchee say that their name means "real men." The Hottentots refer to themselves as Khoi-Hoi which means men of men. The Yahgan of Tierra del Fuego (of all places) say that their name means men par excellence. The Andamanese, a people who appear to lack even the rudiments of law, refer to themselves as Ong, meaning men. All these people reserve these terms only for themselves. It is a sign of a low cultural state when this attitude is taken, but then, when a people hold the opposite attitude, it is likely a sign of a high cultural state. Thus, when any people achieve a stage of intellectual development at which they clearly conceive that all people are related in a way which assures them equality as human beings, they are then highly cultured, even though the mechanics of their civilization may appear at a low stage of development. From this we ought logically to gather that the writer of Genesis was a highly cultured individual. Indeed, it seems to me that only with a high conception of God would such a conception of man be possible, and therefore Genesis 10 would seem to bear testimony to a very high order of religious faith. In the final analysis, one might ask whether it is possible at all to sustain a true conception of the equality of man without a true conception of the nature of God. The former stems directly from the latter. The only ground for attaching to all men an equal level of worth is the tremendous fact that all souls have equal value to God. Assuredly, they do not have equal value to society.

Unless the ultimate standard of reference is the value which God attaches to persons, it is quite unrealistic to talk about all men being equal. Consider the drunken sot, wallowing in the gutter, poisoning the air with his foul language, utterly confusing his children, destroying his family life, disgusting his friends, disturbing his whole society - how can such a man possibly be of equal value with, for example, a pillar of the community who is full of neighbourly goodness? Clearly, there is no equality here if the basis of evaluation is man with man, or man with his society.

Any society which evaluates it members by their worth to itself is not attaching value to the individual person at all, but only to his functions. When these functions no longer serve a useful purpose, the man ceases to have any value. This was Nietzsche's philosophy - and Hitler's. It is the logical philosophy of anyone who views man apart from God. It is also the philosophy of education today, emphasizing skill and technology, encouraging men to do rather than be well. Against this tendency of natural man to "de-valuate" himself while supposing he is exalting himself, the Bible could not do anything else but set forth in clear terms these two complementary facts: that God is concerned equally with all men and that all men belong to one family, uniquely related through Adam to God Himself. The argument, so stated, is an argument also for the comprehensiveness of the Table of Genesis 10. Unless it is comprehensive, unless ultimately all mankind is in view here and not just those nations which Israel happened to have cognizance of, it is a chapter out of keeping with its context. Unless the whole human race is intended, the chapter's purpose is in doubt and the message of the Bible is incomplete. We are then left only with Acts 17:26 which, at this point, while assuring our hearts, does not enlighten our minds as to the facts that it gives.

There is a negative side also to the matter of the authenticity of this historical document. Had this Table been designed for propaganda purposes (to establish Israel's position as of equal dignity though not sharing some of the glories of the surrounding peoples) or had it been merely the work of some early historian creating his own data with a comparatively free hand, then almost certainly some device would have been adopted for deliberately setting forth not only the high status of his own ancestors, but the very low status of that of his enemies. With respect to the first tendency, one has only to read modern history books to discern how very easily individuals of little real significance can be presented to us in such a way as to make us take enormous pride in our heritage. There is, in fact, very little written history which is not in part propaganda, although the author himself is often unaware of it. The number of "firsts" claimed by some national historians for their countrymen is quite amazing, and it is usually clear what the nationality of the author himself is. In complete contrast, it would be difficult to prove with certainty of what nationality the author of Genesis 10 was. We assume he was a Hebrew, but if the amount of attention given to any particular line that is traced were used as a clue to his identity, he might have been a Japhethite, a Canaanite, or even an Arab. This is remarkable and shows enormous restraint on the author's part, the kind of restraint which suggests the hand of God upon him.

With respect to the second tendency, the belittling of one's enemies, this chapter most assuredly would have been a wonderful one in which to put the hated Amalekites in their proper place. But the Amalekites are not even mentioned. Of course, it might be argued that the Amalekites did not even exist at the time he wrote, a supposition which I consider highly probable. If this is the case, this is a very early document, not a later one as Driver would have had us believe. In any case, the author could have treated the Canaanites similarly.

One further aspect of the tone of the Table is the modesty of its chronological claims. Whereas Baylonians and Egyptians in the "parallels" which they have preserved for us extend their genealogies to absolutely incredible lengths - in some instances occupying hundreds of thousands of years - there are no such claims made or implied in Genesis 10. The feeling which one has in reading this chapter is that the expansion of population was quite rapid. Certainly, it is all most reasonable. This feature of the Table is ably summed up by Taylor Lewis who remarked: (10)

How came this Hebrew chronology to present such an example of modesty as compared with the extravagant claims to antiquity made by all other nations? The Jews, doubtless, had, as men, similar national pride, leading them to magnify their age upon the earth, and run it up to thousands and myriads of years. How is it, that the people whose actual records go back the farthest have the briefest reckoning of all?

The only answer to this is, that while others were left to their unrestrained fancies, this strange nation of Israel was under a providential guide in the matter. A divine check held them back from this folly. A holy reserve, coming from a constant sense of the divine pupillage, made them feel that "we are but of yesterday," while the inspiration that controlled their historians directly taught them that man had but a short time upon the earth.

They had the same motive as others to swell out their national years; that they have not done so, is one of the strongest evidences of the divine authority of their Scriptures.

As a matter of fact, those "parallels" that do exist elsewhere in the literature of antiquity not only completely lack the sobriety of Genesis 10, but owe their existence rather more to the desire to record notable conquests than to any philanthropic philosophy. As Leupold has aptly said: (11)

No nation of antiquity has anything to offer that presents an actual parallel to this Table of Nations. Babylonian and Egyptian lists that seem to parallel this are merely a record of nations conquered in war. Consequently, the spirit that prompted the making of such lists is the very opposite of the spirit that the Biblical list breathes.

Such records cannot, in fact, properly be classed as "parallels" at all. As Marcus Dods observed, (12) "This ethnographic Table is not only the most ancient and reliable description of the various nations and peoples, but it has no parallel in its attempt to exhibit all the races of the earth as related to one another."

The Structure and Purpose of the Table

The structure of things is normally related to the purpose they are intended to serve. This applies in engineering design, and it applies to physiology. It also applies in literature, whether as novel, poetry, legal document, or history. It applies also to Genesis 10. This document has more than one purpose but is so constructed that all its purposes are served equally well because of the simplicity of its conception.

The method of course, is to present a series of names, whether of individuals, whole tribes, or even places, as though they were "persons" related by birth. This is done in a simple straightforward manner, several lines being traced for several generations, here and there a comment supplying additional information. As a consequence of the particular form in which our sense of "precision" has developed in Western Culture, we find it difficult to accept the idea that if a man founded a city or a tribe, such an aggregate of people could still be summed up in the person of the founder, so that they could with equal propriety be referred to as his offspring. Thus in verse 15, Sidon is spoken of as the firstborn of Canaan: whereas by verse 19, Sidon is now clearly the city of that name. Similarly, Canaan is mentioned in verse 6 as a son of Ham and subsequently in verse 16 as father of several tribes who indeed, in verse 18, are referred to as his families. In the following verses, the name refers to the territory he occupied, which is geographically defined. We think of this as a rather loose employment of the term son, but it is simplicity itself when it comes to establishing origins. As Dillmann put it: (13)

In the representation given of this fundamental idea of the relationship of all peoples and men, each particular people is conceived of as a unity summed up in and permeated by the influence of its ancestor.

Although Dillmann does not elaborate on the implication of his observation regarding the persistence of the character of an individual in his descendants so that the observation appears almost as a chance remark, it will be well in discussing the purpose of the genealogy (in its bearing on its structure) to pursue this implication a little further, before returning to a more detailed examination of the structure per se.

The point of interest here is that there is a sense in which the character of an ancestor may for a short while, and occasionally for a very long time, permeate the characters of his descendants. Sir Francis Galton, (14) and others, first applied statistical analysis for sociological data in an attempt to demonstrate that there is such a thing as hereditary genius. It is not clear today whether such traits are genetically linked or the result of circumstances: for example, a famous lawyer may bias his children to follow in his footsteps and give them a headstart by his accumulated means and technical aids. The same may happen in the practice of medicine. Similarly, circumstances may sometimes result in a long line of great actors. Possibly in the realm of artistic ability we have a larger measure of genetic influence.

The idea that a "father" determines to a significant extent the character of his descendants for several generations underlies a certain class of statements that appear both in the Old and New Testaments. Jesus spoke of his bitterest critics as "Children of Satan," or "Sons of Belial," denying emphatically their claim to be "Children of Abraham." The very term, "the Children of Israel," came to mean something more than the mere descendants of Jacob. The Lord spoke of Nathaniel as "an Israelite indeed," having reference to his character, not to his lineage. It is important, in this context, to guard against the assumption that the "children" of an ancestor will only perpetuate the undesirable elements of his character. I believe history shows that there is such a thing as "national character," (15) which appears distinctly at first in a single individual and reappears in his children and grandchildren, with sufficient force to result in the formation of a widespread behaviour pattern that thereafter tends to reinforce and perpetuate itself as the family grows from a tribe into a nation. Where differences in national character do seem to exist, no implication is intended that there is any intrinsic superiority of one kind or another. We are arguing for the existence of differences, not superiorities. In the sum, we are all much alike. This is of fundamental importance.

The possibility that this idea is not foreign to Scripture was noted by Dr. R. F. Grau, who, over 80 years ago, commented: (16)

The object of the document which we are considering is not so much to call attention by these names to three individuals (Shem, Ham, Japheth) and to distinguish them from one another, as to point out the characteristics of the three races and their respective natural tendencies.

It is customary now to divide the world's present population into three racial stocks, Caucasians (essentially, the White Man), Negroids, and Mongoloids. It is exceedingly difficult to define successfully the distinguishing characteristics of any one of these three, although it might seem quite otherwise. Negroids are presumably black but Australian aborigines are not Negroid, though quite as black. The straight, black hair, the brown "slant" eyes, the epicanthic fold, and other features commonly accepted as characteristically Mongoloid, can be observed frequently among people who are classed as Caucasians. To repeat, although everyone thinks it is a simple matter to distinguish the three groups - and in most cases they can - it is virtually impossible to write down a foolproof description which will clearly mark out what tribe or nation belongs within which group. There is, however, one way in which it could be done - especially if we limit our view to a much earlier period in history when racial mixture had not proceeded very far - and this is to trace representatives of each tribe to their known ancestors and set forth, in some kind of genealogical tree, the relationships of these ancestors. Viewed in this light, the method of Genesis 10 is probably the only valid way to go about it.

In this Table, we again meet three groups of people, the descendants of Shem, Ham, and Japheth. But these three groups do not correspond with the current classification of races, for in this Table it is apparent that Negroid and Mongoloid are classed as one family, and the trilogy is reconstituted by setting the Semitic peoples in a distinct class by themselves. So then, we have the Japhethites who can be conveniently equated, for our purposes, with the Caucasians, Indo-Europeans, or White Man; the Hamites who are held to encompass the Negroid and Mongoloid branches, i.e., the so-called coloured races; and the Shemites who comprise the Hebrew people (both ancient and modern), the Arabs, and a few once-powerful nations, such as the Assyrians and Babylonians. This is a very sketchy outline, but it will serve for the moment until the details of the Table can be examined more specifically.

The Thesis: The Purpose Elaborated

Now, it is my firm belief that God has endowed these three groups - which we shall henceforth refer to normally as Japhethites, Hamites, and Shemites - with certain capacities and aptitudes which, when properly exercised, have made a unique contribution in the total historical development of mankind and which, when allowed to find full cooperative expression during a single epoch, have invariably led to the emergence of a high civilization.

This subject has been explored at some length by the author and was the basis of an accepted Ph.D. thesis. (17) It is presented in simple outline in Doorway Paper No.28 (and in Vol. I Three Branches), "Shem, Ham, and Japheth in Subsequent World History," and one critical aspect of it is examined in some detail in Doorway Paper No. 43, "The Technology of Hamitic People." (Vol. III, The Second Branch).

In a nutshell my thesis is this: that mankind, considered both as individuals and as the species, Homo sapiens, has a constitution which seeks satisfaction in three directions: physically, intellectually, and spiritually. There are people who live almost entirely for the physical; we often speak of them as "living to eat." There are people who live almost entirely in the intellectual realm, who gladly surrender a meal to buy a book. Then there are people to whom things of the spirit are completely paramount. Such people often go into permanent "retreat" and, for a large part of Christian history, they formed a separate class. Most of us probably live in these three realms with approximately equal emphasis, depending upon circumstances at the time. (18)

A survey of history with this thought in mind, applied to nations or races rather than to individuals, reveals that Japhethites have originated the great philosophical systems; the Shemitic peoples, the great religious systems whether true or false; and, surprising as it may seem to one not familiar with the evidence, the Hamitic people have supplied the world with the basis of almost every technological advance. This is not the time or place to attempt a demonstration of this thesis, since it has been undertaken in the two papers mentioned above. The extent of the evidence is remarkable indeed, although all the more so in that only in recent years has the debt of the white man to the colored man been recognized to any extent. New discoveries are constantly being made as a result of a continuing research into the origin of inventions, and these bear out the above observation in quite unexpected ways.

When the philosophical bent (which originated with the Greeks and the Aryans and successively elaborated by Western Man) was finally wedded to the technical genius of Hamitic peoples in Africa, Asia, and the New World, there arose the modern phenomenon of Science, enormously enlarging the fruits of this marriage. But the tendency, when the union of these two is most fruitful, has always been for a kind of dehumanized civilization to appear. What is necessary if this result is to be avoided, is the spiritual component, this contrbution being supplied initially by the Shemites, and now by the Christian Church. Without the Hamitic contribution, the contribution of Japheth led nowhere - as in Greece. Without the contribution of Japheth, the contribution of Ham stagnated as soon as the immediate practical problems of survival had been sufficiently solved. This kind of stagnation can be illustrated by the history of some of the great nations of antiquity, the Egyptians, for example. These interactions are examined elsewhere, but the important point to underscore at this juncture is that the various contributions of the various nations and peoples do not appear as contributions made by any one "family" unless one has the clue of these family relationships, which Genesis 10 supplies.

Given this clue, and allowing that the Table is a true historical record, these three components for a high civilization - the technological, intellectual, and spiritual - suddenly appear in a new light when it is realized which particular group of people made the most fundamental contribution in each area. The dwelling of Japheth in the tents of Shem, that is, the occupation by Japheth of a position originally possessed by Shem, the taking away of a kingdom from the latter to give it to the former - all these biblical phrases assume a new significance. In short, Genesis 10, by dividing the whole race into three families (though in a way which does not concord with modern concepts of racial groupings) is not thereby discredited but shown to be based upon a much clearer insight into the framework of history. To my mind, there is no question that when we see history as God sees it in its totality and at the end of time, we shall discover that this Table was a fundamental clue to its meaning. And, we would repeat, it serves this purpose because it has a structure which does not agree with modern attempts to redefine the interrelationships of the world's peoples.

Structure of the Table

Now a few thoughts may be in order with respect to the more mechanical aspects of its structure. First of all, it may be noted that the division of mankind into three basic families was not derived from traditions maintained by nations living around Israel or within their ken, because these nations did not have any such traditions. The Egyptians distinguished themselves from other people on the basis of colour, classing the Asiatics as yellow, the Libyans as white, and the Negroes as black. (19) But, in this Table of Nations, the so-called coloured peoples are not distinguished from one another (for instance, the blacks from the yellows) but are classes, if my understanding of the text is correct, within a single family group. And although it is true that the name Ham, meaning dark, may have reference to skin colour - as the word Japheth may have reference to fair-skinned people - the principle does not hold entirely, for some, at least, of Ham's descendants were fair. Indeed, according to Dillmann, there were, in ancient times, fair-skinned as well as the more familiar black-skinned Ethiopians. (20) There is no indication that the Hittites were black-skinned, and the same is probably true of the descendants of Sidon, etc. On the other hand, the Canaanites and the Sumerians (both descendants of Ham) refer to themselves as "blackheaded" people (21) - a designation which seems more likely to have reference to skin colour rather than colour of hair. Since almost all people in this area have black hair anyway, a hair-colour distinction would be meaningless.

I am aware, however, that it is customary in reconstructions based upon skeletal remains to picture the Sumerians as anything but Negroid. But this is not fatal to our theory for, as we have already noted with respect to the Australian Aborigines, not all black-skinned people are Negroids, and, were we dependent only upon skeletal remains of these Aborigines with no living representatives to guide us, we should have no way of knowing that they were black-skinned at all. The same may apply to the Sumerians and Canaanites. There is little doubt that the people of Sumer and the Indus Valley culture were akin. (22) The descriptions of the Indus Valley people in early Aryan literature indicate that they were Negroid in type. (23) The famous little "Dancing Girl" from the Indus Valley is certainly Negroid, and it is equally evident that genes for black skin still form a large component in the gene pool of the present Indian population. In his Races of Europe, (24) Coon has a section with descriptive materials devoted entirely to many racial types which have contributed to the present population of Europe. In speaking of gypsies and dark-skinned Mediterraneans, he includes two photographs of one young man of clearly "negroid" appearance and comments as follows:

Of much greater antiquity outside of India is a dark-skinned [in the photo, almost black], black-eyed, and straight-haired Mediterranean type which appears with some frequency in southern Iran and along the coasts of the Persian Gulf. This young sailor from Kuwait will serve as an example. The origin and affiliations of this type have not as yet been fully explained.

Interestingly enough, a further illustration from southern Arabia shows a young man who, as Coon puts it, "except for his light unexposed skin colour....could pass for an Australian aborigine." The use of the word unexposed inevitably made me think of Ham's reaction to his exposed father. For, if Ham was dark all over, he may have expected his father to be dark also, and his surprise at discovering otherwise might have so disturbed him as to cause him to be forgetful of his filial duty. At any rate, it is clear that in this area of the world, once occupied by the Sumerians, there still remain "unaccountable" evidences of a very dark-skinned component in the population. All these lines of evidence lend support to the contention that the Sumerians may have themselves been a black-skinned people.

The three families are not predicated on the basis of language, either. Again it is perfectly true that the children of Japheth, in so far as they have given rise to the Indo-Europeans, would seem to be a single linguistic family. The same may be said of the Shemites. But when we come to the descendants of Ham we run into difficulties for it appears that in historic times the Canaanites, Philistines, and many Cushites spoke Semitic languages, while the Hittites (also Hamites, from Heth) may have spoken an Indo-European language. The trouble with linguistic evidence, in this instance, is that it really appears too late in history to be decisive.

It has been suggested that the arrangement of the Table was dictated upon geographical grounds: for example, that the children of Japheth spread in one direction - more or less to the north and west, whereas the children of Ham tended towards the south and east, while the children of Shem stayed more nearly at the centre. This, however, would make the document something of a prophetic statement for such a dispersion did not occur until sometime later - unless, of course, one gives the document a late date, a point to be considered later. There is evidence that the writer knew only that some of Ham's descendants had entered Africa, that a large part of Shem's descendants had settled in Arabia, and that Japheth was still not very far to the north, though spreading along the shorelines of the Black Sea and the Mediterranean. In fact, the picture presented indicates a Cush quite close at hand, which was not the same as the Cush later to be found in Ethiopia. Thus, although the Table recognizes, as indeed it had to do, that some dispersion had already taken place in which the members of each family had migrated in more or less the same general direction, this knowledge was not the basis of the threefold division, but rather stemmed from it.

While the writer admits that his genealogy employs not merely the names of persons but also of places and families, even making use at times of language as a guide, it seems pretty clear that the structure of his Table is dependent ultimately upon a true understanding of the original relationships of the founding fathers of each line to their more notable descendants and to one another. To my mind, the very structure of the Table predicates this kind of knowledge of the facts. On no other basis can one account for the circumstance that, for centuries, certain statements have seemed clearly contrary to the evidence. Only as more light appears does the Table prove itself to be correct, where properly tested.

The use of a genealogical tree which does not slavishly demand that individuals only are to be listed, but allows the inclusion of cities they founded, tribes they grew into, and districts they occupied, provides a simple, straightforward, and concise method of setting forth the Origin of Nations.



thumbs up


Last edited by el kabong on Wed Feb 08, 2012 1:06 pm; edited 1 time in total
avatar
MoMo

Posts : 1856
Join date : 2011-07-03
Location : outside the box, I pooped in it.

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  true lilly on Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:30 am

avatar
true lilly

Posts : 6205
Join date : 2010-01-02
Age : 56
Location : VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: .... BOO!!! ...

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum